To an extent yes, get *possible* news from many sources but then verify. Some outlets are far less truthful than others, RT being one of them.
Remember their sole reason for existence and agenda.
We have no idea if any of the vaccines are sterilising (ie they give immunity). That isn't being tested in the trials. Most vaccines generally are NOT sterilising (certainly not fully).JOpenmind wrote: ↑Fri Nov 20, 2020 10:23 am Hi,
So it seems the vaccines effectiveness, so far communicated, are not perfect at immunising the main Covd risk group ie over 75's but if everyone else was to be vaccinated we would by herd immunity protect them significantly even if the vaccines were not effective for the over 75's.
You could advise them to shield and help those that want to but should never, ever lockup people against their will. Their physical and mental health will suffer and in reality, even those of that age with covid survive it.Why don't we just keep, say the over 70's in shielding lockdown for 3 months and let the rest of us mix and naturally get the herd immunity.
So you couldn’t find any usage of the word ‘untested’ by me. You’re building a strawman. How childish.Splatt wrote: ↑Wed Nov 18, 2020 11:34 pm|Time is of the essence. A vaccine without several years of observation is by definition not properly tested.|
Is simply technically and scientifically incorrect unless you class ALL vaccines as "untested".
If it passes all the regulatory requirements then by definition it IS tested.
The link is pure bullshit, the vaccine cannot alter your dna. that is impossible.