Michael Yeadon's latest video on Rumble 26/04/21

Fingal
Posts: 122
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2021 5:11 pm

Re: Michael Yeadon's latest video on Rumble 26/04/21

Post by Fingal »

Mibi wrote: Sun May 09, 2021 4:44 pm He seems an honest person
Honest or not - he's hopelessly wrong.

RichardTechnik
Posts: 279
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2020 11:01 am

Re: Michael Yeadon's latest video on Rumble 26/04/21

Post by RichardTechnik »

Fingal wrote: Sun May 09, 2021 9:46 pm
Mibi wrote: Sun May 09, 2021 4:44 pm He seems an honest person
Honest or not - he's hopelessly wrong.
Another unsubtantiated assertion by one who has no apparent expertise in any scientific discipline that might give any credence to what you utter.

Not much to contribute here - but note that any mention of Yeadon, Cahill, Bakhdi and a few others sends you into a predictable deny-fest.

Kevin_Sceptic
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:04 am

Re: Michael Yeadon's latest video on Rumble 26/04/21

Post by Kevin_Sceptic »

The people that know, explain. The people that simply disagree as a principle, attack, smear, and denigrate.

thinksaboutit
Posts: 674
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2021 11:38 am

Re: Michael Yeadon's latest video on Rumble 26/04/21

Post by thinksaboutit »

Kevin_Sceptic wrote: Mon May 10, 2021 3:48 am The people that know, explain. The people that simply disagree as a principle, attack, smear, and denigrate.
So how do you explain Yeadon's pronouncement in October?

An opinion based on no information or reasoning!.

fon
Posts: 1294
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 12:47 pm

Re: Michael Yeadon's latest video on Rumble 26/04/21

Post by fon »

Mibi wrote: Sun May 09, 2021 4:44 pm He seems an honest person
If dishonst people seem dishonest, they would not do very well.

Theinstaller
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2021 6:46 pm

Re: Michael Yeadon's latest video on Rumble 26/04/21

Post by Theinstaller »

Now regarding what you call vaccine related deaths, we actually have no idea how many there are. The fact that 95% of the oldest and vulnerable people were vaccinated, gives the opportunity to claim that all there subsequent deaths are "related". Obviously these people are prone to dying and some will happen in the near term. That means your claims are rubbish. You may as well call them "tea related deaths" as most will have had a cup of tea.
Creatively replace 'vaccine' with 'covid' and you have made the argument for why the reported covid deaths were massively over-attributed.
With the average age of death from covid at 81 (m) and 85 (f) (slightly above the average age of death in general for previous years - all ons/bmj data) perhaps they too were simply tea related.

halfhearted
Posts: 42
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2021 3:02 pm

Re: Michael Yeadon's latest video on Rumble 26/04/21

Post by halfhearted »

Fingal wrote: Sun May 09, 2021 9:46 pmHonest or not - he's hopelessly wrong.
Wrong about what? You don't even know what his position is. You implied that he believes that the virus is a "hoax". He does not. You also implied that he is "anti-vaxx". He is not. To disagree with someone you first HAVE to understand what they are claiming. You haven't got a clue, your attack is on him as a genuine, articulate, qualified and experienced opponent of British government policy. He worked with Patrick Vallance in the Wellcome research labs. What EXACTLY are you saying he is wrong about?

Rudolph Rigger
Posts: 177
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2020 11:04 am

Re: Michael Yeadon's latest video on Rumble 26/04/21

Post by Rudolph Rigger »

Just ignore the government sponsored turnips - they are only here to disrupt and create a bad atmosphere. They clearly can't carry the argument with any rational analysis or evidence. They keep asking the same moronic questions, making the same ridiculous assertions - despite having so many things explained to them time and time again. They don't pay any attention to the answers they receive.

They have gotten so many things wrong - a level of error orders of magnitude greater than anything Mike Yeadon has achieved. But they're not really interested in right or wrong. They're only here to keep the level of disruption high.

Just ignore them

Teebs
Posts: 243
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2020 10:20 am

Re: Michael Yeadon's latest video on Rumble 26/04/21

Post by Teebs »

All the facts he states are just that: facts.

He debunks everything about variants, the risks of sars-cov2 and everything else.

The image he builds by connecting these factual dots is horrendous, but compelling.

I was always of the opinion that these are bumbling fools in politics who panicked and are now desperate to wriggle out of the mess they created, and the vaccines are just a way out for them. But … why vaccine passports and extend to vaccinating children? If they are just looking for a political exit, then a bit of vaccine is enough, sweep it all under the carpet, declare victory and move on. But, by carrying on with the passports and mass vaccination and children … none of this is politically expedient.

It begs the question: why?

Nobody
Posts: 286
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2020 12:05 pm

Re: Michael Yeadon's latest video on Rumble 26/04/21

Post by Nobody »

I think it was Primo Levi who said "evil requires organisation". What are the conditions of possibility of the world's governments all making the same mistakes and pursuing the same policies? You might expect some idiosyncrasies, like not closing churches or attacking priests, but the forms of state power have been uniform, as if orchestrated without an apparent conductor. Do you believe that in the face of evidence regarding masks, for example, which originally Fauci said made no difference, that they simply made mistakes that they then sustained or do you think the sustaining of the perpetual cycle has malign intentions? They know from scientific research the side-effects of these vaccines, so why allow themselves to be maneuvered into a position where the only solution was an ineffective and unsafe vaccine?
If state institutions had functioned properly, and the professional groups had acted responsibly, none of this would ever have happened. Why were drugs like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, as well as the others that American doctors use to treat the virus, not adopted. Both are cheap as well safe even for pregnant women. Why were alternatives not adopted? Why was the crisis dealt with in an overhand, undemocratic, way? If there was a genuine crisis, why were alternative forms of social organisation not adopted?
The complete failure of the state apparatus is what you have seen and its complete betrayal of national cultures and the people themselves. What the crisis shows is that our public institutions are not fit for purpose and cannot be trusted. Why was a vaccine-only strategy adopted as the saviour of humanity and only way out of a series of policies that had been adopted without consideration of their effects and in the face of continuous criticism from some very eminent people.
For me, the inhumanity of the conditions established never should have allowed lockdown to be considered. That the status of public existence was never properly discussed and that groups, particularly among the young, were incarcerated, is a crime against humanity and I hope those responsible rot in hell. Sadly they are social gods who can construct their version of heaven on this earth and force others to live varieties of hell as a consequence.

Post Reply