MSM 'comments'

User avatar
Posts: 1032
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2020 2:27 pm

MSM 'comments'

Post by MikeAustin »

Following LS reporting the overwhelmingly negative response to Gove's pro vaccine passport article in the Daily Telegraph a few days ago, I was prompted to make comments myself. One has to subscribe to read the articles and comments, let alone make comments. However, one month free and three months for just £1 would be worth it. It could be amusing as well as informative.

Gove had invited opinions. There were about 7,000 comments when I added mine to the tally. Of these, I would say 99% were against Gove's position - and not by a small degree. There was outright condemnation for most of the government's actions, not just the vaccine passports. I was rather buoyed by this. Could true-blues really be so anti?

Tne next day or so, there was an article from so-called 'Telegraph Readers' that purported to sumnarise the opinions of DT readers. The first comment it quoted was pro-Gove. It ended up saying there had been a more-or-less 50/50 response! Of course, this article attracted more condemnation, including mine.

So I wonder what happens to these comments. Are they actually binned, or are they passed on as a measure of public sentiment in general, or of DT readers in particular? Is this just a place for people to air their grievances, get them off their chest and take no further action?

Indeed, to a certain extent, this forum could unwittingly serve a similar purpose unless we visibly rise up in protest. Reluctant as I am to take it to the streets, I am beginning to feel that is what I must do.

Posts: 1498
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 12:46 am

Re: MSM 'comments'

Post by Splatt »

A Guardian section on the same thing showed almost everyone in favour (of course).

Says more about the political leanings of the various publishers than anything about actual public opinion.

Post Reply